Feeds:
Posts
Comments

The Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) organizes every year an Indigenous Fellowship Programme, which is an extensive training programme aimed at strengthening indigenous representatives’ knowledge of the United Nations system, general Human Rights mechanisms and other mechanisms more specifically dealing with indigenous issues. This programme is exclusively for indigenous persons. It is implemented in close cooperation with University partners and other UN agencies. Trained participants are better equipped to assist their organizations and communities in using existing international instruments and mechanisms to protect their rights. This training programme is available in 4 languages: English, Spanish, French and Russian. For more information on the fellowship programme, please visit our website: http://www2.ohchr.org/english/issues/indigenous/fellowship.htm

Deadlines to apply to the 2010 programmes per linguistic versions are: English: 30 April 2009, Spanish: 15 July 2009, French: to be confirmed, Russian: 30 September 2009

I had a conversation with a friend a while back about how white people often put two hands up in defense when talking with people of color. I’m not saying that other people don’t do this either, but since it’s been brought to my attention, I’ve noticed it repeatedly during certain kinds of conversations. These conversataions usually have to do with white privilege in some way, whether that’s the term being thrown around or not.

Recently, I was at a conference for high school students on labor issues. It was an amazing experience for me to see 14-18 year olds diving into social justice issues, most for the first time in any organized way. These teens were talking about all the same things that (hopefully) come up in any kind of organizing work. The only difference was that the vocabulary that most were using was quite basic. There was no dancing around topics, no academic jargon to baffle or intimidate. For me, I felt that I was given an opportunity to hear what people really think, without worrying too much about people covering up what they really mean intentionally or not. Okay, so with that disclaimer aside, I was really disturbed by a lot of what was said.

One white boy in particular (should I mention he was the blondest bluest I’ve seen since I lived in Savannah?) struck me as he did this all to familiar song and dance during a conversation about racism being over. (It’s not in case you were confused). He felt the need or entitlement to respond after everyone’s statements, jumping people in line, cutting people off. He kept explaining himself over and over to ensure that we understood what he really meant, so we didn’t get him twisted with a racist person. He ever so intentionally told us how he felt us and really agreed with what we were saying, even when he completely nixed all of it with his frequent verbalizations. Time and again when folks spoke out against his and a few others’ points that indeed racism is still an issue, he lifted his hands in defense. I felt like it was a response to the individuals. He did not have the same reaction when one of his white friends challenged what he said. But he definitely did it when the Chinese American-identified girl retorted quite powerfully. When he did it to me, I couldn’t help but think that I was being too harsh or making it personal, even when I know I wasn’t. And that kind of shit gets to you. That’s how people go insane.

He certainly waved his white flag in surrender.

People of color are painted as criminals, as monsters, as aggressive all the mofuckin time. This we know. So when we interact with those who have internalized fears and hatred, we get treated that way. And one of those ways is the two hands up gig. It’s might not be that they meant to do that, but what I’m really concerned with is what oppressive moments were played out unintentionally, subconsciously. That’s what worries me.

I’ve noticed it often with white women, but recently I’ve noticed it with white guys. Those that are blatantly racist don’t do it as much. Maybe they don’t feel the need to even defend their statements. It the ones that call themselves “not racist” or “activists” or “liberal” or “open-minded” or “color blind” or “Christian.” My ass. None of these titles I’m particularly in love with, but if you’re going to use them, then let it be true. I wrote this quote down and to be honest I can’t exactly remember where it’s from or the context. (I believe it’s in Rebecca Walker’s Black, White and Jewish.) She says, “Nor was I comforted by his revealing that he was a civil rights attorney and therefore ‘knew’ these things.” To me this really touches on the idea that people often give themselves labels that imply that they’ve worked out all their internalized shit and they use it as a way to excuse themselves from any other prejudice or oppression that comes. The truth is we haven’t worked it all out. None of us. What we can do is to really continue to try and learn and grow, even if that means bringing more work and extracting personal, emotional monsters.

So here’s the deal. Two hands up means you’re attacking me. Perhaps. Think about it at least. If you catch yourself (period) in a conversation, on a historically touchy subject but especially when it’s not, and your biceps contract, palms exposed, stop. Analyze yourself. What is making you feel defensive?

It was a late night. I probably smoked a j. But for some reason I got the urge to create a post called “The Most Brilliant Video I’ve Ever Seen” and never finished it. Why? I’m not so sure anymore. I thought maybe you could help me.

Looking at it now, I do remember that I was primarily going to comment on the dudes dancing from Rotteram, Netherlands. What are they doing? It’s so funny to me to see how this how these individuals interpret the beat. I try to focus on one for a few moments to see if I can get into the rhythm, and I never can. This is not a post about white people can’t dance per se. But what is it that accounts for such different interpretation? I feel like my whole shit would be thrown off if I were there.

2/24/09

What turns me on? Gio wants to know. Really I want and need to know. What are my sexual fantasies? Good question.

I love being on top of a woman, staddling her and letting the tips of my breasts run along her body. Up past her breath and kisses on the way back down. My nipples whisper long-kept secrets everywhere on her lucious warm flesh. You don’t know how excited you make me. That keloid makes me wet. The soft flat part between your breasts makes me curl at the stomach, eyelids falling gently shut. The sweetness dancing on your skin sashays through my nostrils where it reaches adventures past and fantasies to come. But I am here finally traversing the hills of your hips and thighs until I reach the open meadow, majestic and delicate, in which I lay my cheek. Listening. Listening to all the whispers you’ve kept from me. As much as you’ve bit your tongue to keep from speaking poems of your love, as much as you’ve kept your hands in your coat pocket to keep from fingering all my crevices when we say hello, as much as you’ve averted your eyes, I see through your temple. All those memories and wishes you envision I see too, I feel too. And all that you believe is private is projected at large into the ether surrounding you. The world sees what you can’t see, what we all see while your eyes are averted. Look at me and give in. Give in and come in. You will find a familiar passageway, dark so that you are enticed by the smell and taste of that fruit that is so good you don’t plan on sharing and feel like the only way to move through the grooves is to consult the rhythms of your heart and my breath.

http://www.blackwomen2009.org/

The Conference

On March 28, 2009 the Graduate Center for Worker Education at Brooklyn College will welcome some of the leading activists and scholars to take part in a national conference that will discuss the historical and current accomplishment of black women in the United States.
Black women have been leading the struggle for social transformation dating from the American Revolution to the present struggle for the presidency of the United States. This conference will examine the multifaceted leadership contributions of Black women as presented by leading scholars and social activists.

FEATURING

Angela Davis

Manning Marable

Genna Rae McNeil

Leith Mullings

Erik McDuffie

Bill Fletcher, Jr.

Gerald Horne

Frances Fox Piven

Mary Louise Patterson

Carole Boyce Davies

Kimberly Springer

Brooklyn College Graduate Center for Worker Education
ATTN: Black Women 2009
25 Broadway, 7th Floor
New York, NY 10004, 212.966.4014
Email: info@blackwomen2009.org

You know what, we don’t look at the night sky enough. Many of us in the city have given up on it, but I know in my part of BK I can actually see something other than fog at night. Instead of assuming that we can’t see the stars, let’s at least try.
One of my favorite things to do in the world is to look at the night sky with someone else who is in another place. It seems so amazing that we all can witness the same thing. Jupiter, Venus, and the crescent Moon will appear close together in the southwestern sky shortly after sundown on Monday, December 1st. I’d love for everyone to check this out. How could you want to miss something that won’t occur again until 2052? And since 2012 is coming around the corner….

I’ll be looking for Jupiter, Venus and the crescent moon.

I think we all have the potential to love any and everyone. What makes that “special person” significant is that they make you want to acknowledge, to evaluate, to work on that potential love. That’s being in love. This process, of moving to fully loving a human being, is a humanizing process, for both that person and you. In it you see that the person, you and others are truly human in all capacities, including the potential for mistakes and the potential to learn and the potential to grow.

 

Another topic, one day off the top: intimacy.

 

Until next time, love.

Clearly, the “revolution” has yet to come. Change is not going to be dropped off by the stork on our doorstep, so we need to do more thinking about and more acting on how we can adopt it. These are a few thoughts I’ve been having about reformation and revolution. They are directed to those who consider themselves revolutionaries and to those who want change but wouldn’t necessarily hold up their fist with the aforementioned.

1) Reformation and revolution do not occur without each other. Think about it, and read on. I expand on it in the rest of this post.

2) The imagination and our imagined community and our ideology can be revolutionary, and I think should be. We need to imagine all that we can imagine. Using our imagination liberates us from the shackles of the ordinary, from the accepted, the norm. For this reason, I am on a science fiction kick. Currently I’m reading Octavia Butler’s Wild Seed for the Quirky Black Girls book club. Can’t say that I’m too far in, but already I’m loving the fact that the lines of race and gender and age are being blurred by characters Anyanwu and Doro who have the ability to change their outward appearances and physical strength while those around them are mortal and cannot. It completely fucks with my notions of perspective and permanence. In other words, it’s expanding my brain and giving me an alternative to life outside of how it exists now. That’s revolutionary.

Not only must we imagine, but we have to be willing to experiment according to that freed logic. In her book Abolition Democracy: Beyond Empires, Prisons, and Torture, Angela Y. Davis talks about what she learned from the 1960s & 70s rights movements.

“I don’t know how else to talk about this other than to encourage people to experiment. This is actually the lesson I would draw from this period of the 1960s and 1970s, when I was involved in what were essentially experimental modes of conventional civil rights organizaing. Nobody knew whether they would work or not… I think the best way to figure out what might work is simply to do it, regardless of the potential mistakes one might make. One must be willing to make mistakes. In fact, I think that the mistakes help to produce the new modes of organizing–the kinds that bring people together and advance the struggle for peace and social justice.”

One more thing on this. A friend and blogger black scientist was recently asked for evidence that fundamental/systematic change can occur through electoral politics. She responded, “I have no problem believing in things that have not yet happened.” Thank you! Me neither.

3) Do we think the revolution is just gonna pick up one day, and the next we’ll have this new world to live in where we’re all free from oppression? Someone has to be behind it, and let’s face it, we’re not all going to be behind it at once. As much as we would like (and trust, I would love it) big things poppin, we’re going to have to think about social order the way the designers and the supporters of this order have thought about it, we’re going to have to acknowledge how powerful these systems are, we’re going to have to acknowledge that there are people behind these systems as well and most of all we’re going to have to understand that creating change takes effort, time and patience. If I could snap my fingers, I would, but unfortunately I can’t.

Get over it. The whole world is not going to come to this great conclusion tomorrow. Let’s continue to do what we’re doing in support of the revolution, and create new avenues to get there, accepting smaller victories as victories but with hope and action for better things to come. We have not won until everyone has won.

The most practical way to revolution is to think and act in terms of long term and short term goals. Answer for yourself, what is it that I want my world to look like? How do I want to be able to live? Now, how are we gonna get there? We’re going to have to make plans and make moves, but we won’t be able to achieve everything at once. We have to accept and celebrate steps in the right direction.

The most important thing we can do is to educate and become educated on how to liberate ourselves and each other, but as we all know, education takes time. It is not easy to unlearn and to learn anew how to build and live in a world where we are free.

4) Wishing the worst so people will be forced to react is downright malevolent. Maybe you don’t know what I’m talking about. I’ve been hearing people say (and I’ve thought it, too) around the buzz of the bailout that they hope the U.S. goes into a complete depression so people will finally decide to do something about the state of the economy.

I’ve also heard that maybe it was a good thing that Bush was such a fuck up in office for 8 years, because now we realize that something different needs to happen. True, we wouldn’t be where we are now if shit hadn’t gotten so bad (a lot of people maybe would not have voted for Obama), but I wouldn’t go so far as to say that it was necessary or even good.

It’s awfully privileged to think this. I know that even in these trying times, I still have a little cushion to plop down on. Most of America isn’t so lucky. Most of America is suffering, can’t find a job, can’t feed their kids, much less themselves. They’re locked up and won’t be rehabilitated. They can’t walk down the street without being called a “cocksucker” or thought of as a “nigger,” and they certainly aren’t considered more than roaches to far too many lucky citizens.

We already have enough to think about. We (maybe not you, because you have enough money to afford your internet access and enough time to be reading my blog) the people are suffering and smiling. We need a strategy that doesn’t require reaction, reaction to “sudden” disaster. Let’s build, not destroy.

5) Because it needs to be said, sorry, Barack Obama is not the black Jesus we’ve been waiting for, people. 

6) Why is it that many die-hard Obama fans, so-called revolutionaries refused to acknowledge or support candidates like Cynthia McKinney and Rosa Clemente? Why is it that few people raved about candidates like these but could not support Barack Obama? What is so wrong with support? Support is support is support. It is not a zero sum game. Because you get down with one candidate does not necessarily mean you oppose another. If you must know, I voted for Obama/Biden, but I informed myself about other parties, tried to get the word out about other candidates, considered my options in voting outside of bipartisan lines and thought long and hard about what the most revolutionary thing to do was. I was at the Green Party Party in LES during the first part of election night (there’s a big long rant here, but I’ll save it for a rainy day) and I was happy to see that people had actually voted for Obama. I support those who challenge the system. Obama and Clemente both were doing that. Yes, I can only vote for one, but I do not deny support for the other because of those rules.

7) You needn’t be wealthy to do something. I remember when activists around me where scrambling after Katrina. Over the next few school breaks, a number of (Jewish) students had gone and come back from the 9th ward. I sensed obnoxious pride in those people who were able to fly there and a low sense of worth in those who cared but could not get there. I don’t think we should waste time in measuring aid and creating other forms of oppression within well-intentioned activists. We all have access to very different resources and we all do certain things that make us happy. Let us, in our own ways, put these together to create our paths towards liberation.

8 ) The revolution starts in you. All those supposedly little things really do count for a lot. Choosing the spinach over the big Mac, getting enough rest, drinking your water and being yourself are among some of the most revolutionary things we all can do.

The Barnard Center for Research on Women, in conjunction with The Cooper Union, The Center for the Humanities at CUNY, The College and Community Fellowship Program at CUNY, and Center for the Study of Gender and Sexuality at NYU, presents:

Abolition Democracy and Global Politics
a lecture with Angela Davis
Thursday, October 30
7:00 pm
The Great Hall, Cooper Union

Since well before the publication of the feminist classic, Women, Race, and Class in 1981, Angela Y. Davis has been concerned about the interconnections among issues, as well as about connections among peoples around the world. In “Abolition Democracy and Global Politics,” Davis will present a new and wide-ranging vision for making connections among both issues and peoples. She develops the term “Abolition Democracy” from W.E.B. DuBois’s influential text, Black Reconstruction in America, connecting the abolition of slavery, of the death penalty and of prisons themselves to the possibility of substantive democracy in the United States and globally. As Davis stated in a recent interview, “DuBois … argues that a host of democratic institutions are needed to fully achieve abolition—thus abolition democracy…. In thinking specifically about the abolition of prisons, [for example], using the approach of abolition democracy, we would propose the creation of an array of social institutions that would begin to solve the problems that set people on the track to prison, thereby helping to render the prison obsolete.” In her lecture, Davis will link this concept of abolition democracy to questions of global politics. What does it mean that the prison-industrial-complex, often led by U.S. corporations, is expanding globally? What are the connections between the rapid expansion of prison industries and the military-industrial-complex? What global forces contribute to the exploitation of peoples in different parts of the world? How can feminists and other advocates for democracy connect their movements around the world? On October 30, we will learn what visions of another possible world—one of freedom, justice and democracy—are offered by these movements and by Davis’s long experience as both an activist and a scholar.

Professor Davis’s teaching career has taken her to San Francisco State University, Mills College, and UC Berkeley. She has also taught at UCLA, Vassar, the Claremont Colleges, and Stanford University. She has spent the last fifteen years at the University of California Santa Cruz where she is Professor of History of Consciousness, an interdisciplinary Ph.D program, and Professor of Feminist Studies. Angela Davis is the author of eight books and has lectured throughout the United States as well as in Europe, Africa, Asia, Australia, and South America. In recent years a persistent theme of her work has been the range of social problems associated with incarceration and the generalized criminalization of those communities that are most affected by poverty and racial discrimination. She draws upon her own experiences in the early seventies as a person who spent eighteen months in jail and on trial, after being placed on the FBI’s “Ten Most Wanted List.” She has also conducted extensive research on numerous issues related to race, gender and imprisonment. Her most recent books areAbolition Democracy: Beyond Empire, Prisons and Torture and Are Prisons Obsolete? She is now completing a book on prisons and American history.

Directions: The Great Hall at Cooper Union is located at 7 East 7th Street between Third and Fourth Avenues. The closest subways are the R or W at 8th Street, or the 6 at Astor Place.
This event is free and open to the public. Seating is first come first served.
American Sign Language interpretation will be provided.

For more information:
(212) 854-2067
bcrw@barnard.edu
www.barnard.edu/bcrw

Older Posts »